Political Leadership Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Political leading - Research Paper ExampleShapiro (2007) has also pointed out that administration is a mere part of leading because relying on administration solely makes a leading style repetitive, predictable and vulnerable to macro environmental changes. To understand political leadership, one has to understand the multi-causal social processes which create the drive for leadership. Greenstein (2006) has defined political leadership as the subtype of human social leadership. An individual cannot define political leadership or grasp the prescriptive prescriptions of political leadership without enquiring about values, power relations attitudes and action of leaders in cultural-institutional and historical context of use (Peele, 2005). In the political leadership, both leaders and followers pass through the casual but notice sequence of power exchange and motivation building (Walzer, 2007). However, Peele (2005) has argued that political leadership is a widely undergo phenome non but understanding about the phenomenon is pretty much tacit in nature. For example, phenomenon such as fight between countries, central human rights controversies, Olympic rivalries etc might act as situations which deal with political leadership. whizz thing is clear from the argument of research scholars that it is very difficult to create a standardized exposition of political leadership due to involvement of both institutional and historical contexts. Ruscio (2004) has rightly stated that no political leadership concept is complete without the understanding its role on democratic government. For example, throughout the invoice of mankind, societies have asked for certain rules and procedures in order to create a practical framework which can pose the interest of democratic society.... This paper stresses that Readers of this research paper might question that why the researcher has not yet provided a concrete definition of political leadership? Well, the fact is that de finition of political leadership changes from country to country. For example, a political leader with a sentimental and compassionate is ideal choice in Indian context but the same leader would be viewed as failure in Russian cultural context. According to Vigoda, Elgie and Peele, a political must have characteristics such as, 1- a strong respectable character and personality which can synchronize with ethical-cultural character of subordinates, 2- a constructive agenda for solving a particular problem, 3- interpretive judgment to define a situation to followers and 4- the material or impalpable technique to mobilize the support of followers. However, there is no doubt that political leadership has direct friendship with military, law authority or ideological leadership hence it will not be faulty to assume that political leadership is modified version of social leadership.This report makes a conclusion that it is discernable from the above discussion that responsibility of a political leader differs along with the political environment of a country. For example, behavior of a democratic political leader significantly differs from an autocratic leader. The researcher is begging forgive of the readers for emphasizing more on democratic aspects of leadership in contrast to other aspects. But, it was a publication of personal choice for the researcher and the researcher believes that democratic political leadership is flexible enough to fulfil into modern business environment.